Archive for April, 2008

Challenge BBC

Quoted disscussion from http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/en/viewthread.php?tid=349&page=1&authorid=770 

Challenge BBC: An Institution with Doctrines and Practice of Public Journalism? Objective Journalism? 

If BBC is by doctrine maintained as a “classical” media, then its practice may be subjected to watch for bias. If BBC is by doctrine a Public Journalism or even “Objective Journalism” , there is no bias to watch.  If it does fall into the latter category, then what exactly is its “value” and what does it advocate? Who in where is or are the targeted audience? 

Furthermore, is BBC an institution for journalism so as to distinguish from those blogs, forums…the public media of free expressions and exchanges of various individual opinions? If BBC does depends on the subscriptions or other financial means supported financially by its audiences, then it is not exactly a propaganda machine to conduct information warfare to supply misinformation to targeted audiences as the institution(s) operated under the U.S. Department of Defense paid by a federal fund. 

BBC often labels China with the word “the Communist”. If this is a reflection of the values of BBC and thus the news gathering angles to be based off, then it helps to explain why the BBC’s news reports on China do not see the events “eye to eye” with China which by constitution is a Communist country. If this is a logical to presume, then the BBC should have no reason to complain that the Chinese Government does not offer equal opportunities for them to access to the news events in China: sure enough, the anti-communist BBC will always be gathering the evidence to advocate its own values that may be found in total conflicts with the ones of the Chinese Governments.

Given it is not a “non biased” fact finding totally subjective to the naked truth, without any objective comments/interpretations, the BBC has politically placed itself on “the other side” opposing to the side of the Chinese Government.

If BBC is openly advocate its values in its journalism practices, in various languages, Continue reading ‘Challenge BBC’

Endgame for the Dalai Lama

Endgame for the Dalai Lama: Black Hat Sect Dismantling Power Base

New America Media, News analysis, Yoichi Shimatsu, Posted: Mar 21, 2008

Editor’s note: The façade of Tibetan unity has unraveled and along with it, the Dalai Lama’s power base. Yoichi Shimatsu, former editor of the Japan Times Weekly in Tokyo, was executive producer of the video documentary “Flight of a Karmapa” (Nachtvision 2002) taped in the Tsurphu area of Tibet, the Mustang region of Nepal, Sikkim and Dharamsala.

Hezuo, Gansu Province – For decades, the Beijing government had recognized the Dalai Lama as its sole negotiating partner in Tibetan affairs. For the officialdom, it was simpler to deal with a single person — the “pontiff” of Tibetan Buddhism – to control the entire ethnic population. The façade of Tibetan unity was convenient to both sides but now it has unraveled, and it’s the endgame for the Dalai Lama.By ordering the monks of his Gelugpa or Yellow Hat sect to hold peaceful rallies on the 49th anniversary of the Chinese invasion, the Dalai Lama — unwittingly — ignited pent-up emotions among Lhasa residents. Scenes like the head bashing, stoning and kicking of a prostrate bicycle owner arose from popular grievances against runaway price inflation and perceived discrimination against Tibetans in their own land. Such cruelty, regardless of past injustices, has nothing to do with Buddhist teachings but arises from the human condition.Unfortunately for the Dalai Lama, the loyalists in his once-powerful organization inside Tibet are being selectively investigated, arrested and detained for causing the violence. The Beijing government has repeatedly stated that only a small minority of Tibetans loyal to the Dalai Lama were involved in the protests. Whatever its legal flaws, there’s more than a grain of truth in the official assertion.Amid the mayhem and anarchy, a decisive factor in the Tibetan equation has gone practically unnoticed: Key major players did not join or support the protests:– The Panchen Lama, a top prelate of the Gelugpa or Yellow Hat school, second in rank only to the Dalai Lama himself, has spoken in no uncertain terms against the rioting and instead backed the government.

– Leaders of the Nyingma and Sakya schools, as well as the native Bon religion, did not endorse the protests and are tight-lipped about the wave of arrests. – Laymen with the re-ascendant Kagyupa or Black Hat school, are furious with the Dalai Lama after being targeted by Gelugpa supporters during the horsemen’s raid on the Hezuo local district office in south Gansu and in several counties in Sichuan Province.

In this negative light, the rallies by the Gelugpa monks seemed a desperate bid to reassert the Dalai Lama’s authority by accusing their Tibetan rivals of being “collaborators” and presenting themselves as the “resistance.” Due to the unintended violence, however, the Yellow Hats find themselves as the odd man out. Following the crackdown, rival sects are moving to dismantle the remnants of the Gelugpa organization, which had the monopoly of power over the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) and other districts as recently as five years ago.

If the façade of Tibetan unity was convenient, it now no longer serves.

In January 2000, the Chinese view of the Dalai Lama started to undergo a radical change during the affair known as the “Flight of the Karmapa” – covered in a documentary by Nachtvision. The Karmapa is the head lama of the Kagyupa, or Black Hat school, which ruled Tibet until the reign of the 5th Dalai Lama began in 1642.

At the turn of the millennium, the teenage Karmapa, born Ogyen Trinley Dorje, began a secret journey from his seat in Tsurphu monastery, west of Lhasa, to Sikkim in north India to recover the mystic Black Crown of the Kagyupa. In the bid to strengthen his nomination against other contenders, the Karmapa rode horseback on a tortuous path through the frozen wilderness of Nepal’s Mustang region. At the 4,500-meters altitude Thorong-La Pass, he was separated from his Nepalese Kagyupa guide and whisked aboard a mountain-rescue helicopter. He soon turned up under virtual house arrest near the Dalai Lama’s headquarters in Dharamsala, India.

As told by his guide, the Venerable Gyaltsen Rimpoche, nicknamed the “Tall Manangi,” the Ogyen Trinley had to retrieve the charismatic crown because “in Lhasa the Karmapa was rising and becoming more popular, so the Gelugpa did not like it and the situation was becoming dangerous for him.” Only the magic talisman could turn the tables on the powerful Yellow Hats.

In the eyes of many Kagyupa monks, the Karmapa has been abducted by the Dalai Lama’s exile government and remains a hostage to the senior leader of a rival sect. The Black Hats responded furiously with demands to Beijing that Gelugpa monks should be stripped of their control over the Tibet province budget and other privileges.

Feeling sorely betrayed by the Dalai Lama, who had earlier backed the appointment of Orgyen Trinley as Karmapa, Beijing consented to the Black Hat’s harsh demands. Thus ended the Yellow Hats’ monopoly on power inside Tibet. Since then, the local governments of many Tibetan zones have been taken over by laymen loyal to the Black Hats. Hezuo, the scene of the horsemen’s well-publicized raid, is the site of the Kagyupa’s Milarepa Shrine. Horses were used in the attack because the raiders came from the Xiahe district, the stronghold of the rival Gelugpa’s Labrang Monastery.

This realignment of sectarian power in Tibet, which can be compared with the Protestant Reformation in Europe, is only now coming to light in public discourse after the Lhasa riots. A People’s Daily editorial, titled “No return to old Tibet” (March 18), stated: “the political exile (Dalai Lama) has continued his rule with an iron fist that smashes any challenge to his power from anyone or any sect. . . . Local Tibetans have managed their affairs well without his interference.”

In private, many exiles across the Himalayas, including former Khampa guerrillas who fought the Chinese army in the 1960s, recount disturbing allegations of the Dalai Lama’s security team’s involvement in the murdering of his critics by poisoning and bombing. This dark side of intra-Tibetan intrigue is yet to be factually uncovered before world opinion.

In an ultimate irony, the only person who can prevent the coming demolition and disgrace of the Gelugpa school is Gyeltshen Norbu, the Beijing-appointed Panchen Lama.

The Panchen Lama probably won’t rush to their defense, not after pro-Dharamsala lamas lobbied furiously against Beijing’s attempt to appoint the young lama as a delegate to the National People’s Congress, held in early March, arguing that he was not yet 18 years of age. To avoid controversy, Beijing reluctantly conceded, even though the official birth date of Gyeltshen Norbu was February 13, 1990, making him 18 and eligible.

The Panchen Lama is likely to receive Buddhist VIPs at the Beijing Olympics. An audience and blessing from the bright young monk will certainly win international support for his confirmation of the next reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. It is the traditional custom for the Panchen Lama to confirm the reincarnated Dalai Lama and vice versa. By contrast, high-ranking monks have scoffed at the Dalai Lama’s idea of forming a committee to elect a successor.

The recent uprising in Lhasa, despite its grim pathos, is a reminder of the tragic 1959 insurrection that resulted in the deaths of thousands of Tibetans. In both cases, the 14th Dalai Lama badly miscalculated the divisions among his own people, Beijing’s strategic determination, and the moral hypocrisy of the international community.

In the Buddhist view, all things come full circle. In the 17th century, the 5th Dalai Lama called in a Mongol general to overthrow the Karmapa’s theocracy. Today, the Karmapa’s men are ousting the Gelugpa power structure. Ceaseless change is unstoppable, taught Sakyamuni Buddha. Thus, attachment only results in suffering – our attachment to wealth, power, pride, respect and, most of all, to love, the meanest vice yet highest virtue of human existence. Not even his bitter opponents can dispute the deep love of His Holiness the Dalai Lama Tenzin Gyatso for his homeland, Tibet. How difficult it must be now, to let go.

Am I living in ‘Medieval Age’?

Well, no wonder there are still some French people supported Dalai Lama’s ‘Theocratic Society’. I can’t believe that 56% believed ‘Sun rotates around Earth’ over 42% believed ‘Moon rotates around Earth’.

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

和傲慢德国同事争论三天 结论:德国人无可救药[转自 中华网]

Quoted from  http://www.onechn.com/read.php?tid=680

和傲慢德国同事争论三天 结论:德国人无可救药

注:本文较长,希望诸君耐心看看,西方人在中国崛起的问题上是如何寝食难安的。 

当德国人听说,我们也有超市,也有电脑时,他们的反应时:”中国不该有这些!”. 

当中国的经济规模听说和德国接近甚至可能已经超过时,被优越感冲昏头脑了的德国人无论如何无法接收这个现实,所以,中国一有风吹草动德国举国上下一起起哄。 

通过这次西方人对中国的全面围剿(西藏问题上),暴露出西方对中国崛起的担忧,中国人在没有人号召的情况下(包括海外华人)空前团结,不管政府是否腐败,大家把国家的统一看得非常重要,反应了我们中华文化无比的凝聚力,这真是所谓”人权”,”民主”人士真正害怕的。 

中国人啊,中国永远是我们的祖国, 

中国人永远是我们的第一属性。我们身体里流淌者中华的血。 

敌人如何我们管不了,但我们自己必须自强!  

转贴:和傲慢的德国同事争论三天 结论:德国人无可救药,觉得中国就不应该存在 

2008年3月30日 星期日 于斯图加特 

我实习的办公室本来有三个人,但是有一个同事出差了,于是就剩下了我和我斜对面的K。K最近没什么事情干,闲得很。 

(在西藏问题之前的一次对话) 

2008年3月11日,一个别的同事给我拿来一张法兰克福汇报,上面有关于北京机场新航站楼T3建成的消息。在德国,这种带着酸味的报道就算是非常中立了,我已经非常满足了。我于是在网上看了很多T3的照片,激动得热泪盈眶。那时候正好是中午休息,我就问K要不要看看。她过来看了一眼,  说:”是不是挺大的?”  Continue reading ‘和傲慢德国同事争论三天 结论:德国人无可救药[转自 中华网]‘

‘Democracy’ debate at Anti-CNN

Following discussion posts are selected from BBS debate on ‘democracy’ at www.anti-cnn.com , please directly visit the website for more details as I only selected and copied a bit to incite the discussion. It is a good debate.

http://www.anti-cnn.com/forum/en/thread-1071-1-1.html

Why Chinese do not make democracy and human rights big topics?

Hello,

I have a question and suggestion for my Chinese readers here:

Why not make human rights, press freedom and democracy big topics from Chinese point of view?

I like the idea of human rights, think that the idea of human rights describe a hope for a better living of the people and I think that many people in the world and probably in China, too, like the idea. I wonder, why the oficial China seems to be so passive in this international discussion and I really would appreciate a more forwarding role of China in this discussion. I believe, China might be proud of it’s practices of good govermnment, their way to make a better living people possible and their way to protect their people against black propaganda like we witness it now in the transatlantic Tibet campaign.

So why not talk about democracy? I think photos like this from Aleksandar Vodevic may be a good start an international discussion on topics like democracy, freedom and human rights:

democracy_will_come_to_you.jpg

I think, the best way to immunize people against brutal coordinated attacks with black propaganda like we just saw it on Tibet province is to open their eyes in advance. When China opens the eyes of their own people, I hope, they might open the eyes of Western people, too, and make them help to come to a better living. That’s why I appreciate this forum a lot. Continue reading ‘‘Democracy’ debate at Anti-CNN’

Behind Anti-China slogans

Behind the anti-China Olympics campaign
By Gary Wilson
Published Mar 27, 2008 8:53 PM

China and America: The Tibet Human Rights PsyOp

by Michel Chossudovsky

Published by Global Research, April 13, 2008

Reporters Without Borders Financed by CIA
Ten anti-Castro “journalists” in South Florida
on US government payroll
By Luciana Bohne

How We Must Deal With The Worst Crisis in History
by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
Published April 11, 2008

NED did the same thing few years ago
U.S. Paid 10 Journalists for Anti-Castro Reports
By ABBY GOODNOUGH
Published: September 9, 2006

New definition of ‘Non-Violent’ by exile tibetan

 Well, It is a humiliation for CIA sponsored ‘Free Tibet’ claimed by exile Tibetans. If that is what CIA provokes, then I think CIA/NED (Since CIA got a really bad reputation, now NED(National Endowment for Democracy) is funding ‘Free Tibet’ movement) will need to redefine the definition of ‘Non-Violent’. Please save money for education not confrontation. ‘Cold War’ is finished!…..If you want to end the Terrorism, please do not ‘educate’ terrorists. One Al-Qaeda is enough for the peace world.

Dalai Lama, please could you give SFT a free ‘Non-Violence’ lesson while you are busy on travelling around the world? No American dollars, please!  

Exile Tibetans, I suggest a reading from your brother in China Tibet-born-Tibetan Talked about Tibet .

Following ‘Inconsistent Logic’ tell you the lies?

“First of all, I must make it clear that the Tibetan (rioters) have been non-violent throughout (the incident). From Tibetans’ perspective, violence means harming life. From the video recordings you can see that the Tibetans rioters were beating Han Chinese, but only beating took place. After the beating the Han Chinese were free to flee. Therefore there were only beating, no life was harmed. Those who were killed were all results of accidents. From recordings shown by the Chinese Communist government, we can clearly see that when Tibetan rioters were beating on their doors, the Han Chinese all went into hiding upstairs. When the Tibetan rioters set fire to the buildings, the Han Chinese remained in hiding instead of escaping, the result is that these Han Chinese were all accidentally burnt to death. Those who set and spread the fire, on the other hand, had no idea whatsoever that there were Han Chinese hiding upstairs. Therefore not only were Han Chinese burnt to death, some Tibetans were burnt to death too. Therefore all these incidents were accidents, not murder.”The above is Dawa Tsering, an Additional Secretary in the Department of Information and International Relations of the Tibetan government-in-exile in an an interview on 2 April 2008 with Radio France International ‘s Chinese program in response to a question about why the Dalai Lama has not condemned the violent actions of rioters during the unrest.  Following texts are quoted from youtube

On April 2nd, 2008, in an interview with Radio France International’s Chinese language program, Dawa Tsering, Chinese Affairs Officer of Tibetan government-in-exile, claimed that Tibetan’s killing in Lhasa, Tibet on March 14th, 2008, was non-violence.  

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Another Voice of Tibet thinks attacking torch bearer in wheelchair is FANTASTIC and non-violent  

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube videoNetizens respond:
marklillu (3 days ago) Show Hide

what peaceful message this exile tibetan gov wants to spread over to the world? Violence is only referring to killing; but looting, burning, attacking can not counted? Amazing free-tibet!

pugster73 (4 days ago) Show Hide

According to this nut, if burning, looting, and stoning is considered ‘non-violent’, I hate to see what he considers to be violent. Continue reading ‘New definition of ‘Non-Violent’ by exile tibetan’

USA propaganda movie in 1940s: Tibet is part of China

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Tibet-born-Tibetan Talked about Tibet

shirley dit:
forward some comments from a local Tibetan and hope can give some insight to those who are interested in the issue:
http://thedaily.washington.edu/2008/4/14/dalai-lama-speak-uw/
No293/294/323/324/345 Comments By Namjagbarwa, From Eastern Tibet

Thank you for comments above. I still respect His Holyness the Dalai Lama. No matter what he has done and what he’s been telling the world. The truth will prevail eventually. I, and I believe many other non-Gelug Tibetans, want him to come back to Tibet and China. Not for the divide of a nation, but for us finally being able to return the integrity of our religion to Tibet. Maybe my thought is just too childish and wishful.

My memory just jumped back to my childhood. I wasn’t able to speak any Chinese before 9 years old. I only spoke Kham-Tibetan back then, one of the three Tibetan dialects(Amdo, Kham, Native Tzang-offical Tibetan). All my math classes were taught in Kham-Tibetan and I still remember how hard the teacher tried to explain mathematic theories to me. I still can remember her face because her Tibetan sounded very funny. Now it’s nothing but respectful and thankful to her. Since central goverment does not have any policy and benefit to promote volunteers, plus Tibet’s very rural and remote condition, inland people do not want to give up their fancy world and come to live here. So our access to basic education was very limited at that time. Only volunteers who were romanticly even naively attracted by our religion and gorgeous landviews would stay. My math teacher was one of them. She is my angel. She went back to inland in 2006 due to the Cardiac Hypertrophy she was suffering in Tibet Plateau. After all, she was only breathing at 60% oxygen of normal level at 4100 meters/13500 feet, comparing with her hometown’s altitude of 5 feet. And I KNOW she did NOT receive even one penny of subsidy from the government, both local and central. and She was not the only one. Continue reading ‘Tibet-born-Tibetan Talked about Tibet’

Freedom and Democracy in a Spanish’s eye

http://www.jean-luc-melenchon.fr/?p=585 incredible, Jean Luc Melenchon’s blog got more than 2600 comments……I think this gonna be World record!!!

2052 Sisy dit:

A Spainish’s View about Freedom and Democracy wrote in “anti-cnn.com” let me think a lot. I share it with people who come here. How can we built a more beautiful world in this century? 

A Spanish’s words in anti-cnn:
I agree with everything you said. The problem is that Spanish people don’t have a real opinion about anything. They just sit in front of the TV and listen what they guy says, that’s how they “learn” about the world. If the guy says that China has killed 1 million Tibetans, they’ll believe it all. It is the same in most Western countries, but here it looks to be much worse. Western Democracy kills people’s brain. We are supposed to live in absolute “freedom”. So… why should we doubt about our system? Isn’t it perfect freedom?? We are supposed to live in absolute “freedom of speech”. So… why should we doubt about what we read/watch on our “free media”? Etc, etc. Democracy has become a religion, and everybody must trust the democratic system, the tv and the newspapers. If you don’t… you hate freedom, lol. That’s why it is so easy to make the whole society to hate China. Fortunately, a very few of us love something out of the West too much, so that we can see that everything is a huge lie. In my case, I love China. Reading a lot about China and talking to Chinese friends made me seeing my Western world with another perspective. I realized tha the West isn’t better than China. The only difference is that we are economically developed. We are developed thanks to market economy, not thanks to democracy. Market economy makes countries rich, not democracy. After visiting China for study, I saw that people there has the same freedom as us. Maybe even more, as you can walk around at nights in China. In the West, you might be killed thanks to huge crime rates. Also, there is so few drugs in China. In the West, kills are offered all kind of drugs at school!! This is our Freedom!! Continue reading ‘Freedom and Democracy in a Spanish’s eye’

Churchill the Author of “Tibetan Independence”

Following article is Quoted from  http://www.larouchepac.com/node/10503

April 14, 2008 (LPAC)– In papers belonging to T.V. Soong, the wartime (WWII) finance minister of China, released today by the Hoover Institution and Shanghai’s Fudan University, it is clear that the myth of Tibetan independence was launched during World War II by Winston Churchill. The papers contain letters from Kuomintang Party (KMT) leader Chiang Kai-shek complaining about Churchill’s attempt to rewrite history and to characterize Tibet as an independent country, something which it had never been.

“In a telegram to Chiang Kai-shek, then Chinese leader and KMT chairman, dated May 21, 1943, Soong wrote:

‘Churchill said that recently it has been alleged that China has concentrated troops in order to attack Tibet. I replied that I have never heard of such a message.

And meanwhile, I said that Tibet is not an independent nation, as Churchill had claimed. All previous agreements between China and Britain have recognized that China possesses sovereign rights in Tibet, and I believe this fact has already been under your careful examination.’

Chiang wrote back, saying:

‘By treating Tibet as an independent country, Churchill has denied the territorial integrity and sovereignty of our country. It’s a great insult. I did not expect Britain would make such a statement Tibet is part of China’s territory, and Tibetan affairs are China’s domestic affairs.’

To heighten the contrast between this welcome type of patriotic hatred of the British Empire, on the one side, Continue reading ‘Churchill the Author of “Tibetan Independence”’

Who is the Enemy?

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

Call for Anti-BBC Bias Petition

“Journalists have to be precise about where it happened and who were its victims, or readers and viewers will never be able to understand what it meant.”

Enough is enough…….I have found out following petition, I suggest we should do the same thing for complaining BBC Bias report on ‘Tibet Riot’ and ‘Torch Relay’. http://www.petitiononline.com/bbbc/petition.html

To:  Prime Minister Tony BlairPetition

We the undersigned, having observed and documented for many years gross examples of a virulent pro-militant Muslim bias by the BBC; now urge the government to take action against it. The failure of the BBC to properly report events and incidents of this nature around the world from the perspective of a free democracy against this threat, while being financially supported by law within that democracy is untenable, and further increases the threat to our society.

While we can only conjecture at the motives of the BBC to maintain this bias, even after we have ourselves been attacked, it is clear that it is not accidental, and shows this organization to be completely without morals and acting completely against their remit, while using their status to lend credibility to their stance. Appeasement of the Nazis led to many more lives being lost in World War 2, as it now does with militant Islam by providing excuses for them to perpetrate and further their strategy of divide and conquer within our society.

Either the license fee, which gives the BBC their present status and credibility to be used as a tool by the many despotic and totalitarian regimes that the BBC also serves, should be ended, or the BBC should be held accountable and firmly monitored under the penalty of treason should this bias continue.

We urge the government to act promptly and deal with this internal menace to our society before more lives are lost as a result of this continuing bias.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

Tibet in Foreigners’ Eyes

Tibet in Foreigners’ Eyes

Quoted from  http://www.jean-luc-melenchon.fr/?p=585

Proud to be Chinese dit:

http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90776/90882/6395504.html

‘I see different Tibet’: French hotel tycoon tours region by bike
16:04, April 19, 2008

An eight-month bicycle ride from France to Cambodia has given 74-year-old Paul Dubrule a chance to see a different Tibet from what he had learnt in France.

“I spent three months riding through Tibet during that trip. This experience completely changed my perspective about the region,” Dubrule, chairman and founder of the leading multinational hotel group Accor Group, told Xinhua here on Friday.

“Compared with those talking about Tibet in the French media but never setting foot in the region, I think I have more things to tell,” he said.

In 2002, Dubrule, then 68, made a 15,000-kilometer journey by bicycle from his home at Fontainebleau to Siem Reap, Cambodia, during which he rode from Ngari in west Tibet to Qamdo in its east.

“Before arriving in Tibet, I thought local people were under repression of the central government as many other Westerners (thought),” he said.

But, during the tour, he saw schools, hospitals, power plants, airports, and especially highways.

“I saw many roads under construction,” he said. “Along my way, I met many local people. Their life was not as good as in France but I found they were benefiting from the economic development.”

Dubrule had read books about Tibet since the 1990s and many of them portrayed the Dalai Lama as a “saint” and “victim”. But he later learnt in Tibet that under the Dalai Lama’s rule there was no medical service in an area between Ngari and Lhasa. The former is about 1,000 km away from the latter.

“In Tibet, I found that people would like to have the region modernized rather than maintaining old lifestyles simply for tourists,” he said.

He did not agree with the Dalai Lama who said economic development in Tibet was causing a disappearance of traditional culture. “If a culture can not move forwards with economic and social development, it will end up in the museum instead of blessing its people.”

“Should anyone refuse development, schools and hospitals in the name of protecting culture and religion?”

In his 50,000-word travel book, “Le Test du Cocotier”, he wrote about what he saw in Tibet and was criticized by some back home for his stance to support present policies in the autonomous region.

“I am not surprised. Because many French had not been to Tibet, most of the information they got about the region was biased or confused. The real Tibetan history is unknown to many,” he said. “I believe that they will change once they have the access to more positive information and exchanges with Tibet.”

His travel book was published in Chinese in 2005. On the book’s cover, Dubrule, on his bike, passed several Tibetans worshipping local mountain spirits.

“Although I have never met the Dalai Lama, I would like to tell him that a country should protect the religious belief of its people but religions should not be a tool for people to turn against their country,” he said.

Source: Xinhu

Open Letter to French

Below is a quoted letter to Mr. Melenchon from website: http://www.jean-luc-melenchon.fr/?p=585

If you really care about Tibet and Human Right then carefully read the letter, do not just offer a simple slogan ‘Free Tibet’.

1. Dear Mr. Melenchon,

First I would like to express my admiration of your integrity by expressing a different view of approaching China in the interview with TF2. You are really different from the usual politicians who normally cater to the majority views without thinking of the justifiability.

Maybe some information about my background is necessary. I am a Chinese citizen born in a humble farmer family in the year of 1979, the year just after the adoption of Reform and Openness policy by Chinese government. I undertook the college education in China and PhD education in Singapore. And now I am a visiting scholar in a top US business school and about to join a university in Australia as a junior professor. I am quite representative of a generation of Chinese youths witnessing the dramatic changes in China in both economy and politics. Lots of westerners, including French people, worry about the autocracy and the lack of human rights in China and want to ‘Free China’. And as a person who experienced the regime and whose family (a humble and not privileged one) is still under that regime, I think that I have a better understanding of what average Chinese think of their situation and their future.

China is in any way not as democratic and as free as all developed countries are. The citizens still don’t enjoy the rights to express our views completely freely and to elect the government. There is no single Chinese not valuing this kind of rights. And nor do we want to stay in this regime forever. But before criticizing China and imposing any good will on Chinese, it is really necessary to take some efforts to learn the history and the current status of China. China had been deprived of the right to develop for about 100 years before 1949 because of the invasion of then western and eastern emperors including France favoring colonization. As such, Chinese were really hatred of the lack of independence, social inequality and poverty. Continue reading ‘Open Letter to French’

Protected: Anti-BBC

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:


”Rumors stop at wise man”

“Rumors stop at wise man.”
French senator tells you the truth about Tibet.
His name is Jean-Luc Mélenchon,a French socialist senator.

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video

He has written an article on his blog http://www.jean-luc-melenchon.fr/?p=585  

Someone has translated but it didn’t give a credit. I copied from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc2PapnePiQ&feature=related

全文翻譯:

一個借口 如果要組織有效的抵制活動,就不應該選擇在開幕式這種代表團結博愛的時刻。爲什麽不選 擇在經濟上或者金融上進行抵制?—很顯然,沒有任何政要會在這個時候走條路。如果 我們真想敲醒中國政府,爲什麽不在國家間正常交往的期間去督促?有誰去接近過中國政府 主席(有多少抵制者真正想要知道他叫什麽名字?)?向他問了問題?問了什麽?他回答了 什麽?有誰詢問過中國總理(有誰真正想知道他的名字?)?誰有接待過中國駐法大使並且 跟他交流?誰在乎他?帶著一種近似種族歧視的狂妄態度,我們就這麽去反對一個我們連國 家領導人名字都不知道的國家?而且我們還假裝他們不存在?或者我們認爲那裏沒有真正的 領導人?偉大的西方連一個14億人口的國家的領導人的名字都否認掉。我們以爲中國人足 夠懦弱以至于被一個**體系操縱!看到這一切,我只感覺到了強迫中國人進行鴉片交易時 候那些殖民者的蔑視,這蔑視的共鳴!如果我們的意願是對抗中國政治體制,已經格式化的 西方人的看法,已經沒有任何方法可以改變。
所以西藏的起義是個借口。這個謊言完全靠圖像的反複傳播來達到先入爲主而控制大衆思考 方向的目的。例子:只有’d'arrêt sur image ‘這個機構報道了’西藏事件’。

開始于藏人屠殺漢人商人。在世界上哪一個國家出了這樣的事情卻沒有外來反應,它會怎麽 想?一個被藏人亂棍打死的中國漢人的生命就比不上那些上街遊行的藏人嗎?雖然說對西藏 人的友誼有時候只是**的一個惡心的借口—-而這份友誼可以用無知和荒唐來喂養。 也許警方的鎮壓很重—-但是我們怎麽知道?唯一的信息和數字來自于’西藏流亡政府 ‘。我卻聽說中國政府也公布了傷亡結果,這表明當局承認事態的嚴重性。在任何一種情況 之下我們都要嘗試去了解和對比信息。我們要去了解事態如何發展。我們也可以顛倒是非地 說當年是由政府下令把兩個Clichy Sous Bois的少年弄上電杆觸電死亡的—-因爲政府當時正要對郊區進行整頓。沒有人會 下這種幼稚的結論。美國政府也嚴厲鎮壓城區的暴亂。雖然這些都不能當作借口,但是至少 給了我們一個對比的參考。

一個可疑的人物

我要對 Robert Ménard先生,也就是**活動的主要組織者提出我的意見。直到現在,只要跟西藏和 奧運有關,我們只看到這個人物。他說他代表著’無疆界記者’說話,好像這個組織就剩他 一個人在代表了。許多舊行政委員會的會員對民主概念的認識可比Ménard還深得多。 在’法國文化’無線台,主持人在問我西藏和奧運的問題,當我扮演Ménard這個角色 的時候,Marc Kravetz 和 Alexandre Adler先生表現得很沈默。他們並不是在討好我。在台下,他們發表了對Ménard 這個人物的手段和看法。Maxime Vivas有一篇關于他的分析,對于這個人物以及其資金來源十分擔憂。無論怎樣,他好 像從此就成了記者工會頭目,代表國際人權組織以及大赦國際組織等等。他有時還會取代d l喇嘛的位置,而dl喇嘛是支持奧運的。Robert Ménard是個成幾何形狀立方速度發展的人權衛士。當美國正在折磨別國的時候,他有 發動過什麽活動嗎?他的行爲讓人不得不懷疑他的動機。

不能爲農奴制辯護

說說西藏。西藏從14世紀就屬于中國。在Besançon 或者 Dôle並入法國以前,拉薩就已經在中國的統治之下。把1959一次藏民暴動定義成爲 年中國入侵西藏是錯誤的。我們難道能說,當法國共和軍隊去那裏鎮壓保皇派的起義,法國 于是就’占領’了Vendée?dl喇嘛和其他藏區領導者接受了所有共産黨賦予的位置 ,比如說共産黨人民代表大會副主席的位置。1956年共産黨決定廢棄西藏和邊境地區的 農奴制。農奴制把藏人分成了三個階級九個層次,每一層都有一個’價位’,奴隸主可以決 定奴隸的生死甚至實施折磨。共産黨決定廢棄農奴制,我十分贊同。我們還沒有探討到女人 的地位,當然如果想知道的話一定能查到。是共産黨結束了地方頭目間的暴力鬥爭和僧侶犯 法時候的血腥處置。

1959年,在冷戰的背景下,藏人的起義是由美國支持的,無論在物資上還是財力上。接 著,迷人的dl喇嘛傳統體制和恐怖的共産黨入侵史就這麽來了。藏族兒童的入學率現在是 81%,dl統治下的田園歲月則是2%。在地獄一般的中國,奴隸們的年均壽命從以前的 35,5歲到現在的67歲,藏族人口從1959年的1百萬到現在的2百50萬,這些數 字爲什麽他們在遊行的時候不說?中國人值得更多的尊重,而不是去關注那些老生常談– –這些傳言被這樣一種人兜售著:他們這麽做既不爲了自己,不爲了組織,也不爲了佛教 西藏那些皇帝一樣的僧侶統治下的孩子們。

此時此刻,我對’西藏流亡政府’沒有任何同情心可言,因爲它的教皇陛下是唯一的最高決 策者,他的班子沒有一個能在一個政府裏工作,何況是流亡政府,當然我們還沒提及在金融 和事務中他們是什麽樣子。我完全不認同他們的神權政治。我也反對他們把孩子成批吸收進 修道院。我反對農奴制。無論在哪裏,對于什麽,我都是無神論者,所以我反對宗教上的政 治**,甚至’丁丁在西藏’裏那讓人心醉的世界都不能使我動搖。我還反對 ‘僧侶皇帝’反對墮胎和反對同性戀的態度。雖然他不暴力,一直微笑著,風采迷人,但是 他對于這兩方面的宣言對于我來說是那麽腐舊,他的神權統治計劃也一樣。我從來沒有支持 過Ayatollah Khomeiny,雖然我當時反對的是伊朗的Shah。我不支持也不鼓勵dl喇嘛,他 的宗教(跟我無關),他的政治計劃(我反對)和他讓步的嘗試(我譴責)。我要問:爲什 麽dl需要一個國家的身份去當他的精神領袖 ? 而且他要的國家是中國國土的四分之一!他在宗教上和道德上的權威是不是還缺一個王位和 國土來支持他?

戰爭的挑撥者

說說國際法和地緣政治。西藏的故事被它的擁護者塑造成戰爭暴力和混亂的被害者,可以跟 Balkans 相提並論。什麽樣子的西藏是被捍衛的?是那個’大西藏’:包含了雲南和四川地區,在那 些配合拉薩一並發動暴亂的地區?當然,現在興奮的人們忘了這些事情。對這些問題的漠不 關心,對中國曆史文化的漠視,對千千萬萬人生命的漠視,支持藏獨的狂熱體現出來的就是 就是這麽完整的家長式作風,後現代殖民主義和種族歧視。

在報紙上我看到法國運動員身穿一件帶有標語的衣服,標語帶有政治性質。我很清楚,標語 上寫著’爲了一個更好的世界’,看似普普通通。但是對于一般的中國人來說,這道標語明 確攜帶著支持dl的信息。這難道不是超出了國際體育的範疇了嗎?還記得嗎?歐洲遊泳聯 盟會把歐盟遊泳冠軍Milorad Cavic(塞爾維亞人)驅逐出會,因爲當他在領獎台上領獎的時候,他的t恤衫上寫著 ‘科索沃是塞爾維亞的’。這會成爲判例法案嗎?法國冠軍穿著政治標語,在賽場是被禁止 的嗎?當然不是!

除了把敵人大卸八塊的意願或者媒體導演手段加以修飾,形勢很可能會造成成爲那些挑釁者 的窘困。我希望如此。我是中國的朋友。我知道我自己國家的利益和它的價值正在這場鬧劇 中不可能得到任何好處。

Free Tibet Conspiracy and World War 3

Below is  Jeff Steinberg’s Weekly Political Overview from http://www.larouchepac.com

You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video Continue reading ‘Free Tibet Conspiracy and World War 3′

Why Washington Plays ‘Tibet Rouletter’ with China

Why Washington Plays ‘Tibet Roulette’ with China

by F.William Engahl, 5 April 2008

Washington has obviously decided on an ultra-high risk geopolitical game with Beijing’s by fanning the flames of violence in Tibet just as this sensitive time in their relations and on the run-up to the Beijing Olympics. It’s part of an escalating strategy of destabilization of China which has been initiated by the Bush Administration over the past months, and which includes the sttempt to ignite an anti-China Saffron Revolution in the neighboring Myanmar region, bringing US-led NATO troops into Darfur where China’s oil companies are developing potentially huge oil reserves. It includes counter moves across minerals rich Africa. And it includes strenuous efforts to turn India into a major new US forward base on the Asian sub-continent to be deployed against China.

Full article clik link: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8625  or pdf file from following link

http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/print/Why%20Washington%20Plays%20Tibet%20Roulette%20with%20China.pap.pdf

Dalai Lama is charged with Religion Persecution in India by Tibetans!

Article quoted from http://www.sumatiarya.nl/voiceofDorjeShugden.html 

Western media miss the real Tibet story
By Michael Backman

Also see http://tibetgeneral.iforums.us/vp15.html#15

To sign up petition for requesting Dalai Lama to give religious freedom 

Stop religious persecution! Please visit Western Shugdensociety

http://www.westernshugdensociety.org/

[1]The documentary filmed by Swiss public TV in 1998
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5sOm-uQH9Y&feature=related
[2]An open letter to Dalai Lama
http://www.cesnur.org/testi/fr99/gkg2.htm
[3]Tibetan Parliament in Exile’s Resolution of June 1996
http://www.tibet.com/dholgyal/CTA-book/chapter-3-1.html
[4] http://www.dorjeshugden.com/
[5] Dalai Lama’s talk on Jan 9th, 2008
http://blog.sina.com.tw/d44443/article.php?pbgid=11128&entryid=577270


 

April 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Tags